Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916992›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2024

Brain repair mechanisms after cell therapy for stroke.

Ruslan Rust, Lina R Nih, Luca Liberale, Hao Yin, Mohamad El Amki, Lin Kooi Ong, Berislav V Zlokovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruslan RustDepartment of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3376-3453
Lina R NihDepartment of Brain Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.
Luca LiberaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Hao YinRobarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Mohamad El AmkiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Lin Kooi OngSchool of Health and Medical Sciences & Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia.
Berislav V ZlokovicDepartment of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6802-8232

Funding

BRAIN (Biomimetic Regenerative Angiogenic Immunomodulating Nanocomposite) materials for brain repair after strokeR01NS121150 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI Lina R. Nih · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
3R Competence Centre OC-2020-002Mäxi-Stiftung FoundationNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121150Swiss National Science Foundation CRSK-3_195902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based therapies hold great promise for brain repair after stroke. While accumulating evidence confirms the preclinical and clinical benefits of cell therapies, the underlying mechanisms by which they promote brain repair remain unclear. Here, we briefly review endogenous mechanisms of brain repair after ischaemic stroke and then focus on how different stem and progenitor cell sources can promote brain repair. Specifically, we examine how transplanted cell grafts contribute to improved functional recovery either through direct cell replacement or by stimulating endogenous repair pathways. Additionally, we discuss recently implemented preclinical refinement methods, such as preconditioning, microcarriers, genetic safety switches and universal (immune evasive) cell transplants, as well as the therapeutic potential of these pharmacologic and genetic manipulations to further enhance the efficacy and safety of cell therapies. By gaining a deeper understanding of post-ischaemic repair mechanisms, prospective clinical trials may be further refined to advance post-stroke cell therapy to the clinic.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyStem Cell TransplantationStrokeAnimalsBrainHumansRecovery of Functionbrain injuryiPSCischaemiaregenerationstem cellstherapy

Identifiers

PMID38916992
PMCPMC11449145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.