Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918544›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2024

Sequencing-based analysis of microbiomes.

Yishay Pinto, Ami S Bhatt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Gut-Heart Axis: A Microbiome-Centered Perspective on Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yishay PintoDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ami S BhattDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. asbhatt@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-2975

Funding

Culture-free pathogen tracking in hospitalized patientsR01AI143757 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATT, AMI SIDDHARTH · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Emerging novel mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in the prevalent foodborne pathogen, SalmonellaR01AI148623 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATT, AMI SIDDHARTH · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIH HHS R01AI143757NIH HHS R01AI148623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes occupy a range of niches and, in addition to having diverse compositions, they have varied functional roles that have an impact on agriculture, environmental sciences, and human health and disease. The study of microbiomes has been facilitated by recent technological and analytical advances, such as cheaper and higher-throughput DNA and RNA sequencing, improved long-read sequencing and innovative computational analysis methods. These advances are providing a deeper understanding of microbiomes at the genomic, transcriptional and translational level, generating insights into their function and composition at resolutions beyond the species level.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.