Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920427›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Programmes Addressed to Informal Caregivers' Needs: A Systematic Literature Review.

Laurência Gemito, Elisabete Alves, José Moreira, Maria Fátima Marques, Ermelinda Caldeira, Rogério Ferreira, Isabel Bico, Lara Pinho, César Fonseca, Luís Sousa and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus on Care Competencies for Community Citizens in Japan: A Modified Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laurência GemitoSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9254-6083
Elisabete AlvesSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-0887
José MoreiraSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-768X
Maria Fátima MarquesSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.
Ermelinda CaldeiraSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-9262
Rogério FerreiraComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-2036
Isabel BicoSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-2233
Lara PinhoSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-0744
César FonsecaSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6975-612X
Luís SousaComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-5690
Manuel LopesSão João de Deus School of Nursing, University of Évora, 7000-811 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7554-8041

Funding

APPACDM of Évora (Associação Portuguesa de Pais e Amigos do Cidadão Deficiente Mental) and the Municipality of Évora CLDS 4G (CCP 13/2020)Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04923/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing informal caregivers' needs is essential for ensuring quality healthcare and promoting citizen-centred care. This systematic review assessed current knowledge about programmes aimed at meeting the needs of informal caregivers of adults who are dependent on others for daily life activities.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, the electronic databases EBSCOhost Research Platform, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and The Virtual Health Library were searched for randomized experimental studies published between 2012 and 2022 that implemented programmes addressing informal caregivers' needs to improve their experiences, health, and well-being. Quality was assessed using the standardized critical evaluation tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Two independent investigators performed the eligibility assessment and data extraction. Quantitative data on the effectiveness of interventions were collected, and the content of each intervention was synthesized and aggregated into categories, through narrative synthesis.

resultsThe majority of the included studies (n = 16) were conducted in European countries and implemented a structured intervention programme compared to the provision of usual care. The studies were of fair to high methodological quality, with a higher risk of bias related to blinding. The results supported the achievement of favourable health outcomes among informal caregivers, namely improvements in mental health (n = 3) and quality of life (n = 3) and a decrease in psychological symptomatology (n = 5) and burden (n = 3). None of the interventions reported adverse outcomes; however, five studies did not describe significant differences in the outcomes assessed after the implementation of the programmes. Interventions focusing on training and educating caregivers (n = 14) and cognitive-behavioural strategies (n = 7) were the most common, while programmes focusing on emotional and psychological support as a resource to improve caregivers' psychological outcomes were scarce.

conclusionsThis systematic review adds to the growing body of evidence and insight showing that programmes that address informal caregivers' needs seem to contribute to better physical and psychological health outcomes through the promotion of caregivers' educational support and the implementation of cognitive-behavioural strategies. Future research should implement methodologically robust cross-country programmes tailored to informal caregivers' physical, emotional, psychosocial, societal, and educational needs throughout the care trajectory.

Indexed as

ageinghealth outcomesinformal caregiversneeds assessmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38920427
PMCPMC11202834

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.