Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920439›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Differentiation between Normal Cognition and Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults Using Discrepancy Scores Derived from Neuropsychological Tests.

Ramón López-Higes, Susana Rubio-Valdehita, Sara M Fernandes, Pedro F S Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramón López-HigesDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-4190
Susana Rubio-ValdehitaDepartamento de Psicología Social, del Trabajo y Diferencial, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-4458
Sara M FernandesCINTESIS@RISE, CINTESIS.UPT, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-0530
Pedro F S RodriguesCINTESIS@RISE, CINTESIS.UPT, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-0987

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities RTI2018-098762-B-C31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have reported subtle differences in cognition between individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) compared to those with normal cognition. This study aimed to (i) identify these differences using discrepancy scores (e.g., categorial-phonemic verbal fluency performance) derived from neuropsychological tests in three cognitive domains (memory: Wechsler's Word List and Digits; executive functions: Stroop and verbal fluency; and language: BNT and ECCO_Senior) and (ii) determine which discrepancy scores are significant for classification. Seventy-five older adults were included: 32 who were labeled SCD+ (age 71.50 ± 5.29), meeting Jessen et al.'s criteria, and 43 in the normal cognition group (SCD-; age 69.81 ± 4.62). Both groups completed a protocol including screening and the specified neuropsychological tests. No differences were found between the groups in their age, education, episodic memory, global cognitive state, or mood. Significant differences between the groups were observed regarding the discrepancy scores derived from BNT (naming) and ECCO_Senior (sentence comprehension). These scores accurately classified participants (71.6%), with ECCO_Senior having a primary role. ROC curves indicated a poor-to-fair model quality or diagnostic accuracy (AUC_

Indexed as

discrepancy scoresexecutive functionsmemorynamingsentence comprehensionsubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID38920439
PMCPMC11202516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.