Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920685›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Tumour Microenvironment: The General Principles of Pathogenesis and Implications in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

Stanislavs Sinkarevs, Boriss Strumfs, Svetlana Volkova, Ilze Strumfa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CD73Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stanislavs SinkarevsDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Boriss StrumfsDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Svetlana VolkovaDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Ilze StrumfaDepartment of Pathology, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-9524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide, constituting around 30-40% of all cases. Almost 60% of patients develop relapse of refractory DLBCL. Among the reasons for the therapy failure, tumour microenvironment (TME) components could be involved, including tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and different subtypes of cytotoxic CD8+ cells and T regulatory cells, which show complex interactions with tumour cells. Understanding of the TME can provide new therapeutic options for patients with DLBCL and improve their prognosis and overall survival. This review provides essentials of the latest understanding of tumour microenvironment elements and discusses their role in tumour progression and immune suppression mechanisms which result in poor prognosis for patients with DLBCL. In addition, we point out important markers for the diagnostic purposes and highlight novel therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansMyeloid-Derived Suppressor Cellscancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF)diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)T celltumour-associated macrophages (TAM)tumour-associated neutrophils (TAN)tumour microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID38920685
PMCPMC11201569

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.