Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920693›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Scaffold Application for Bone Regeneration with Stem Cells in Dentistry: Literature Review.

Elham Saberian, Andrej Jenča, Yaser Zafari, Andrej Jenča, Adriána Petrášová, Hadi Zare-Zardini, Janka Jenčová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Apple-Derived Vesicles Orchestrate Bone Regeneration:International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Functional Scaffolds for Bone and Joint Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elham SaberianKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.
Andrej JenčaKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-7407
Yaser ZafariLyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-6552-9300
Andrej JenčaKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.
Adriána PetrášováKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.
Hadi Zare-ZardiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod 89616-99557, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-2560
Janka JenčováKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue injuries within oral and dental contexts often present considerable challenges because traditional treatments may not be able to fully restore lost or damaged bone tissue. Novel approaches involving stem cells and targeted 3D scaffolds have been investigated in the search for workable solutions. The use of scaffolds in stem cell-assisted bone regeneration is a crucial component of tissue engineering techniques designed to overcome the drawbacks of traditional bone grafts. This study provides a detailed review of scaffold applications for bone regeneration with stem cells in dentistry. This review focuses on scaffolds and stem cells while covering a broad range of studies explaining bone regeneration in dentistry through the presentation of studies conducted in this field. The role of different stem cells in regenerative medicine is covered in great detail in the reviewed literature. These studies have addressed a wide range of subjects, including the effects of platelet concentrates during dental surgery or specific combinations, such as human dental pulp stem cells with scaffolds for animal model bone regeneration, to promote bone regeneration in animal models. Noting developments, research works consider methods to improve vascularization and explore the use of 3D-printed scaffolds, secretome applications, mesenchymal stem cells, and biomaterials for oral bone tissue regeneration. This thorough assessment outlines possible developments within these crucial regenerative dentistry cycles and provides insights and suggestions for additional study. Furthermore, alternative creative methods for regenerating bone tissue include biophysical stimuli, mechanical stimulation, magnetic field therapy, laser therapy, nutritional supplements and diet, gene therapy, and biomimetic materials. These innovative approaches offer promising avenues for future research and development in the field of bone tissue regeneration in dentistry.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationDentistryStem CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsDental PulpHumansRegenerative MedicineStem Cell Transplantationbone regenerationdental applicationsscaffoldstem cellstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38920693
PMCPMC11202130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.