ArticleClinics and practice2024
Predictive Role of NLR, dNLR, PLR, NLPR, and Other Laboratory Markers in Diagnosing SIRS in Premature Newborns.
Article in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Age- and sex- related patterns in hematobiochemical and anthropometric parameters of Macaca monkeys.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Hematological Predictors of Impaired Postpartum Uterine Involution in Thrombophilia: A Multivariate Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Predictive Value of Umbilical Cord Interleukin-6: Implications for Neonatal Care-A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role of qSOFA, Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, MEWS, and PIRO Scores in Predicting the Severity of Odontogenic Infections in Young and Adult Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Dynamic risk stratification and treatment optimization in sepsis: the role of NLPR.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPremature newborns are at a significant risk for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome SIRS, a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive and diagnostic capability of laboratory markers like Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte-to-Platelet Ratio (NLPR) in diagnosing SIRS in premature newborns.
methodsPremature newborns with and without SIRS were evaluated in a prospective design during a one-year period. Among 136 newborns, early and 72 h post-birth analyses were performed.
resultsAt 24 h, NLR's cutoff value was 8.69, yielding sensitivity and specificity rates of 52.77% and 83.47% (
conclusionIntegrating these findings into clinical practice could enhance neonatal care by facilitating the early identification and management of SIRS, potentially improving outcomes for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.