Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922117›Full record

ArticleToxics2024

Integrated Approach for Testing and Assessment for Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) to Prioritize Aromatic Organophosphorus Flame Retardants.

Anna Kreutz, Oluwakemi B Oyetade, Xiaoqing Chang, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Mamta Behl, David G Allen, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Helena T Hogberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna KreutzInotiv, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-0683
Oluwakemi B OyetadeInotiv, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.
Xiaoqing ChangInotiv, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-1848
Jui-Hua HsiehNIH/NIEHS/DTT/PTB, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-1571
Mamta BehlNeurocrine Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA 92130, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3431-8217
David G AllenInotiv, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.
Nicole C KleinstreuerNIH/NIEHS/DTT/NICEATM, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7914-3682
Helena T HogbergNIH/NIEHS/DTT/NICEATM, Research Triangle Park, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-6818

Funding

Scientific Cyberinfrastructure Research ProgramZIAES103385 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, VICKIE · 2022 to 2025
$17.4M
Developmental Neurotoxicity Health Effects Innovation Research ProgramZIAES103387 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MCPHERSON, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2022 to 2025
$5.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) are abundant and persistent in the environment but have limited toxicity information. Their similarity in structure to organophosphate pesticides presents great concern for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). However, current in vivo testing is not suitable to provide DNT information on the amount of OPFRs that lack data. Over the past decade, an in vitro battery was developed to enhance DNT assessment, consisting of assays that evaluate cellular processes in neurodevelopment and function. In this study, behavioral data of small model organisms were also included. To assess if these assays provide sufficient mechanistic coverage to prioritize chemicals for further testing and/or identify hazards, an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) was developed with additional information from the Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) and the literature. Human biomonitoring and exposure data were identified and physiologically-based toxicokinetic models were applied to relate in vitro toxicity data to human exposure based on maximum plasma concentration. Eight OPFRs were evaluated, including aromatic OPFRs (triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), isopropylated phenyl phosphate (IPP), 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDP), tricresyl phosphate (TMPP), isodecyl diphenyl phosphate (IDDP), tert-butylphenyl diphenyl phosphate (BPDP)) and halogenated FRs ((Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP), tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP)). Two representative brominated flame retardants (BFRs) (2,2'4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) and 3,3',5,5'-tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA)) with known DNT potential were selected for toxicity benchmarking. Data from the DNT battery indicate that the aromatic OPFRs have activity at similar concentrations as the BFRs and should therefore be evaluated further. However, these assays provide limited information on the mechanism of the compounds. By integrating information from ICE and the literature, endocrine disruption was identified as a potential mechanism. This IATA case study indicates that human exposure to some OPFRs could lead to a plasma concentration similar to those exerting in vitro activities, indicating potential concern for human health.

Indexed as

developmental neurotoxicityintegrated approach to testing and assessmentin vitro batterynew approach methodologiesorganophosphorus flame retardants keywordphysiologically-based toxicokinetic models

Identifiers

PMID38922117
PMCPMC11209292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.