Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922479›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2024

The paradox of bone mineral density and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes.

Guang-Fei Li, Pian-Pian Zhao, Wen-Jin Xiao, David Karasik, You-Jia Xu, Hou-Feng Zheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guang-Fei Li *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Osteoporosis Research Institute of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Pian-Pian Zhao *The Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wen-Jin XiaoThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Osteoporosis Research Institute of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
David KarasikAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
You-Jia XuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Osteoporosis Research Institute of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. xuyoujia@suda.edu.cn.
Hou-Feng ZhengThe Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. zhenghoufeng@westlake.edu.cn.

Funding

Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology 2021YFC2501702National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370887"Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang 2023C03164 and #2024SSYS0032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is paradoxically increased despite no decrease in areal bone mineral density (BMD). This phenomenon, known as the "diabetic bone paradox", has been attributed to various factors including alterations in bone microarchitecture and composition, hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and comorbidities associated with T2D. Zhao et al. recently investigated the relationship between T2D and fracture risk using both genetic and phenotypic datasets. Their findings suggest that genetically predicted T2D is associated with higher BMD and lower fracture risk, indicating that the bone paradox is not observed when confounding factors are controlled using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. However, in prospective phenotypic analysis, T2D remained associated with higher BMD and higher fracture risk, even after adjusting for confounding factors. Stratified analysis revealed that the bone paradox may disappear when T2D-related risk factors are eliminated. The study also highlighted the role of obesity in the relationship between T2D and fracture risk, with BMI mediating a significant portion of the protective effect. Overall, managing T2D-related risk factors may be crucial in preventing fracture risk in T2D patients.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fractures, BoneHumansRisk FactorsBone mineral densityFracture riskParadoxType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.