Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38924283›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology reports2024

The effects of omega-3, DHA, EPA, Souvenaid® in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ernesto Calderon Martinez, Stephin Zachariah Saji, Jonathan Victor Salazar Ore, Omar A Borges-Sosa, Samyuktha Srinivas, Naga Sai Rasagna Mareddy, Tanseem Manzoor, Mariela Di Vanna, Yasemin Al Shanableh, Rishabh Taneja and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ernesto Calderon MartinezDigital Health, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-9536
Stephin Zachariah SajiOur Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela City, Philippines.
Jonathan Victor Salazar OreFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Omar A Borges-SosaIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Samyuktha SrinivasManipal Academy of Higher Education, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Naga Sai Rasagna MareddyDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Tanseem ManzoorCollege of Medicine University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Mariela Di VannaDepartment of Internal Medicine, RWJBH Rutgers Health CMC, Toms River, New Jersey, USA.
Yasemin Al ShanablehDepartment of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Rishabh TanejaGovernment Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Victor Sebastian ArruaranaInternal Medicine, Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide. Omega-3 fatty acids (n-3-PUFA) are essential to normal neural development and function. Souvenaid®, a medical supplement that contains n-3-PUFA's: eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has emerged as an alternative, slowing cognitive decline in AD patients. In this study, we investigated the effect of dietary supplementation with n-3-PUFA, EPA, DHA, and Souvenaid® in AD patients.

aimThis systematic review and meta-analysis aim to establish the relationship between n-3-PUFA, EPA, DHA, and Souvenaid® with cognitive effects, ventricular volume and adverse events in AD patients.

methodsA systematic search of randomized control trials (RCT), cohorts, and case-control studies was done in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase for AD adult patients with dietary supplementation with n-3-PUFA, EPA, DHA, or Souvenaid® between 2003 and 2024.

resultsWe identified 14 studies with 2766 subjects aligned with our criteria. Most publications described positive cognitive outcomes from supplements (58%). The most common adverse events reported were gastrointestinal symptoms. CDR scale showed reduced progression of cognitive decline (SMD = -0.4127, 95% CI: [-0.5926; -0.2327]), without subgroup differences between different dietary supplement interventions. ADCS-ADL, MMSE, ADAS-cog, adverse events, and ventricular volume did not demonstrate significant differences. However, Souvenaid® showed a significant negative effect (SMD = -0.3593, 95% CI: -0.5834 to -0.1352) in ventricular volumes.

conclusionsThe CDR scale showed reduced progression of cognitive decline among patients with n-3-PUFA supplemental interventions, with no differences between different n-3-PUFA supplements.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3HumansDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3SouvenaidAlzheimer's diseasecognitive declineDHAOmega‐3 fatty acidsSouvenaid®

Identifiers

PMID38924283
PMCPMC11544444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.