Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38925666›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Designing an evidence-informed package of essential health services for Universal Health Coverage: lessons learnt and challenges to implementation in Liberia.

Ala Alwan, Wilhemina Jallah, Rob Baltussen, Manuel Carballo, Ernest Gonyon, Ina Gudumac, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, George Jacobs, Gerard Joseph Abou Jaoude, Francis Nah Kateh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ala AlwanDisease Control Priorities 3 (DCP3) Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK aalwan1@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7054-3328
Wilhemina JallahRepublic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia.
Rob BaltussenDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Manuel CarballoInternational Centre for Migration, Health and Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ernest GonyonRepublic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia.
Ina GudumacDisease Control Priorities 3 (DCP3) Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-5356
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
George JacobsRepublic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia.
Gerard Joseph Abou JaoudeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-3036
Francis Nah KatehRepublic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia.
Gorbee LoganRepublic of Liberia Ministry of Health, Monrovia, Montserrado, Liberia.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liberia developed an evidence-informed package of health services for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) based on the Disease Control Priorities 3 evidence. This paper describes the policy decisions, methods and processes adopted for prioritisation, key features of the package and lessons learnt, with special emphasis on feasibility of implementation. Package design was led by the Ministry of Health. Prioritisation of essential services was based on evidence on disease burden, cost-effectiveness, financial risk, equity, budget impact, and feasibility of implementation. Fiscal space analysis was used to assess package affordability and options for expanding the budget envelope. The final adopted package focuses on primary healthcare and comprises a core subpackage of 78 publicly financed interventions and a complementary subpackage of 50 interventions funded through cost-sharing. The estimated per capita cost to the government is US$12.28, averting around 1.2 million DALYs. Key lessons learnt are described: (1) priority setting is essential for designing affordable packages of essential services; (2) the most realistic and affordable option when domestic resources are critically limited is to focus on basic, high-impact primary health services; (3) Liberia and many other countries will continue to rely on donor funding to expand the range of essential services until more domestic resources become available; (4) national leadership and effective engagement of key stakeholders are critical for a successful package design; (5) effective implementation is less likely unless the package cost is affordable and the health system gaps are assessed and addressed. A framework of action was employed to assess the consistency with the prerequisites for an appropriate package design. Based on the framework, Liberia developed a transparent and affordable package for UHC, but the challenges to implementation require further action by the government.

Indexed as

Universal Health InsuranceCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PolicyHealth PrioritiesHumansLiberiaDecision MakingHealth policyHealth services researchHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID38925666
PMCPMC11202745

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.