ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Limited Added Diagnostic Value of Whole Genome Sequencing in Genetic Testing of Inherited Retinal Diseases in a Swiss Patient Cohort.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of comprehensive genome analysis in clinical sequencing at an academic institution.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Genetic Testing in Inherited Retinal Disease: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- From Genetic Diagnosis to Therapeutic Implementation in Retinal Diseases: Translational Advances and Persistent Bottlenecks.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Inherited retinal disorders in Scotland: A 5 year assessment.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Functional Validation of a Novel Deep IntronicThe application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Toward clinical long-read genome sequencing for rare diseases.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Genetics and diagnostics of inherited retinal diseases in the era of whole genome sequencing.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Nanopore Deep Sequencing as a Tool to Characterize and Quantify Aberrant Splicing Caused by Variants in Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Genes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the added diagnostic value of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) who remained undiagnosed after whole exome sequencing (WES). WGS was performed for index patients in 66 families. The datasets were analyzed according to GATK's guidelines. Additionally, DeepVariant was complemented by GATK's workflow, and a novel structural variant pipeline was developed. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was established in 19/66 (28.8%) index patients. Pathogenic deletions and one deep-intronic variant contributed to the diagnostic yield in 4/19 and 1/19 index patients, respectively. The remaining diagnoses (14/19) were attributed to exonic variants that were missed during WES analysis due to bioinformatic limitations, newly described loci, or unclear pathogenicity. The added diagnostic value of WGS equals 5/66 (9.6%) for our cohort, which is comparable to previous studies. This figure would decrease further to 1/66 (1.5%) with a standardized and reliable copy number variant workflow during WES analysis. Given the higher costs and limited added value, the implementation of WGS as a first-tier assay for inherited eye disorders in a diagnostic laboratory remains untimely. Instead, progress in bioinformatic tools and communication between diagnostic and clinical teams have the potential to ameliorate diagnostic yields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.