ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Contribution of Osteoblast and Osteoclast Supernatants to Bone Formation: Determination Using a Novel Microfluidic Chip.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cellular Automaton-Based Computational Model for Fluid Shear Stress-Induced Differentiation and Migration of Osteoprogenitor Cells in a Microfluidic Chip.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Novel Osteoblastogenic Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluating Complexity in Orthopedic Tissue-on-a-Chip Systems.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Engineering Osteosarcoma In Vitro: From Traditional Models to Biofabricated Platforms for Precision Medicine.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Development of a BMU-on-a-chip model based on spatiotemporal regulation of cellular interactions in the bone remodeling cycle.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We fabricated a microfluidic chip (osteoblast [OB]-osteoclast [OC] chip) that could regulate the mixture amounts of OB and OC supernatants to investigate the effect of different supernatant distributions on osteogenesis or osteoclastogenesis. Computer-aided design was used to produce an OB-OC chip from polydimethylsiloxane. A pressure controller was assembled and different blends of OB and OC supernatants were correctly determined. OB and OC supernatants were placed on the upper panels of the OB-OC chip after differentiation for an in vitro evaluation. We then tested the changes in osteogenesis using MC3T3-E1 cells in the middle chambers. We observed that a 75:25 distribution of OB and OC supernatants was the most potent in osteogenesis. We then primed the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells using an OB-OC mixed supernatant or an OB supernatant alone (supernatant ratios of 75:25 or 100:0, respectively). These cells were placed on the calvarial defect sites of rats. Microcomputed tomography and histological analyses determined a significantly higher bone formation in the group exposed to the OB-OC supernatant at a ratio of 75:25. In this study, we demonstrate the applicability of an OB-OC chip to evaluate the effect of different supernatant distributions of OB and OC. We observed that the highest bone-forming potential was in MC3T3-E1 cells treated with conditioned media, specifically the OB-OC supernatant at a ratio of 75:25.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.