Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

While You Are Sleeping: Marital Ambivalence and Blunted Nocturnal Blood Pressure.

Wendy C Birmingham, Raphael M Herr, Mikel Cressman, Neha Patel, Man Hung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendy C BirminghamPsychology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8908-206X
Raphael M HerrDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0079-2792
Mikel CressmanPsychology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Neha PatelCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.
Man HungCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2827-3740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marital relationships offer health benefits, including a lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, quality of the relationship matters; ambivalent behaviors may increase CVD risk by affecting blunted nocturnal blood pressure (BP) dipping. This study tracked daytime and nocturnal SBP and DBP in 180 normotensive individuals (90 couples; participant mean age 25.04; 91.58% white) over a 24 h period using ambulatory blood pressure monitors to explore the impact of martial quality. Results showed that perceptions of spousal ambivalence were associated with blunted nocturnal BP dipping. Perceptions of one's own behavior as ambivalent also showed blunted nocturnal dipping. When in an ambivalent relationship, a gender interaction was found such that women were most likely to have blunted SBP dipping, but men were more likely to have blunted nocturnal DBP dipping. Overall, this study found an association between ambivalence and BP dipping, thus uncovering one virtually unexplored pathway by which marital relationships may have adverse effects on health.

Indexed as

Blood PressureMarriageAdultBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleSleepSpousesYoung Adultambivalenceblood pressurenocturnal dippingrelationship quality

Identifiers

PMID38928969
PMCPMC11204195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.