Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929738›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Physical Activity during Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Review.

Carmen Rute-Larrieta, Gloria Mota-Cátedra, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres, Victoria Mazoteras-Pardo, Esperanza Barroso-Corroto, Carlos Navarrete-Tejero, Michail Zografakis-Sfakianakis, Athina Patelarou, Maria Manuela Martins, Ana da Conceinçao Alves Faria and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carmen Rute-LarrietaHospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, 28914 Madrid, Spain.
Gloria Mota-CátedraHospital Universitario de Toledo, 45007 Toledo, Spain.
Juan Manuel Carmona-TorresGrupo de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Cuidados, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-872X
Victoria Mazoteras-PardoFacultad de Enfermería de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7606
Esperanza Barroso-CorrotoGrupo de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Cuidados, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-8657
Carlos Navarrete-TejeroFacultad de Fisioterapia y Enfermería, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Tecnológico Fábrica de Armas, Edificio 6. Despacho 1.4, Avd. Carlos III s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Michail Zografakis-SfakianakisDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71401 Crete, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-9580
Athina PatelarouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71401 Crete, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-0650
Maria Manuela MartinsAbel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.
Ana da Conceinçao Alves FariaAbel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-0080
José Alberto Laredo-AguileraGrupo de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Cuidados, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3661-3584

Funding

European Regional Development Fund (DOCM 27/01/2021)Regional Government of Castile-La Mancha SBPLY/23/180502/000002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, pregnant women require more individualized attention in their assistance process during pregnancy. One of the aspects that requires the most focus is the suitability of carrying out physical activity. The objective of this meta-review is to find out the effects of physical activity during pregnancy on the incidence of GDM compared to women who do not perform physical activity.

methodsA search was conducted in Cochrane, CSIC, Ebscohost, Proquest, Pubmed, Scielo, and Scopus. The search focused on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the last five years. The AMSTAR-2 scale was used as a quality assessment tool for the final sample.

resultsA total of 18 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. Sixteen of them found out that physical activity during pregnancy has preventive effects for GDM compared with women who lacked physical activity. Among the studies, we found a reduction in the risk of GDM of between 24% and 38% and odds ratios ranging between 0.39 and 0.83 calculated for a 95% CI. Only two studies did not find statistically significant effects. Other variables such as type and duration of physical activity, overweight and obesity, gestational age, etc., were also considered.

conclusionsPhysical activity prevents the incidence of GDM. The main characteristics that enhance this preventive effect are starting at the initial stages of pregnancy and maintaining during the whole pregnancy as well as combining strength and aerobic exercise at a low to moderate intensity.

Indexed as

gestational diabetes mellitusphysical activitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38929738
PMCPMC11204808

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.