Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933347›Full record

ArticlePolicy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences2024

Designing for sensory adaptation: what you see depends on what you've been looking at - Recommendations, guidelines and standards should reflect this.

Michael A Webster, Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy, Margarita L Zuley, Andriy I Bandos, Lorne Whitehead, Craig K Abbey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael A WebsterDepartment of Psychology and Integrative Neuroscience Program, University of Nevada, Reno.
Mohana Kuppuswamy ParthasarathyDepartment of Psychology and Integrative Neuroscience Program, University of Nevada, Reno.
Margarita L ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine.
Andriy I BandosDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine.
Lorne WhiteheadDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia.
Craig K AbbeyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Funding

SALIENCE, ADAPTATION, AND NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICSR01EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2023
$4.6M
Sequential Reading Effects in Digital Breast TomosynthesisR01CA237827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ABBEY, CRAIG KENDALL, BANDOS, ANDRIY · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
COLOR CONTRAST ADAPTATIONR29EY010834 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237827NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010834NEI NIH HHS R29 EY010834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems continuously recalibrate their responses according to the current stimulus environment. As a result, perception is strongly affected by the current and recent context. These adaptative changes affect both sensitivity (e.g., habituating to noise, seeing better in the dark) and appearance (e.g. how things look, what catches attention) and adjust to many perceptual properties (e.g. from light level to the characteristics of someone's face). They therefore have a profound effect on most perceptual experiences, and on how and how well the senses work in different settings. Characterizing the properties of adaptation, how it manifests, and when it influences perception in modern environments can provide

Indexed as

adaptationindividual differenceslightingmedical image perceptionperception

Identifiers

PMID38933347
PMCPMC11198979

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.