Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937668›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

penalizedclr: an R package for penalized conditional logistic regression for integration of multiple omics layers.

Vera Djordjilović, Erica Ponzi, Therese Haugdahl Nøst, Magne Thoresen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vera DjordjilovićDepartment of Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy. vera.djordjilovic@unive.it.
Erica PonziDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Therese Haugdahl NøstDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Magne ThoresenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 248804Norges Forskningsråd 262111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe matched case-control design, up until recently mostly pertinent to epidemiological studies, is becoming customary in biomedical applications as well. For instance, in omics studies, it is quite common to compare cancer and healthy tissue from the same patient. Furthermore, researchers today routinely collect data from various and variable sources that they wish to relate to the case-control status. This highlights the need to develop and implement statistical methods that can take these tendencies into account.

resultsWe present an R package penalizedclr, that provides an implementation of the penalized conditional logistic regression model for analyzing matched case-control studies. It allows for different penalties for different blocks of covariates, and it is therefore particularly useful in the presence of multi-source omics data. Both L1 and L2 penalties are implemented. Additionally, the package implements stability selection for variable selection in the considered regression model.

conclusionsThe proposed method fills a gap in the available software for fitting high-dimensional conditional logistic regression models accounting for the matched design and block structure of predictors/features. The output consists of a set of selected variables that are significantly associated with case-control status. These variables can then be investigated in terms of functional interpretation or validation in further, more targeted studies.

Indexed as

SoftwareCase-Control StudiesComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansLogistic ModelsCase–control studiesConditional logistic regressionMultiple blocks of predictors/featuresStability selection

Identifiers

PMID38937668
PMCPMC11212437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.