ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Digital Health Programs to Reduce Readmissions in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06813482 (Heart Health at Home - Real-World Evaluation of a Digitally Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Heart Health at Home - Real-World Evaluation of a Digitally Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimising the implementation of digital-supported interventions for the secondary prevention of heart disease: a systematic review using the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Digital Health Use and Interest in Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Cardiac Inpatients: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of safety care and clinical nursing pathway in patients undergoing cardiovascular intervention: a randomized controlled trial.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Digital education for cardiac care readiness among coronary heart disease patients in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
- Digital cardiac rehabilitation versus traditional cardiac rehabilitation in improving health parameters, patient satisfaction and adherence to guidelines-a systematic review and a meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Rethinking Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention in the Digital Era: Patient Empowerment, Adherence and Optimisation of Guideline-based Care.European cardiology · 2026Review
- The impact of patient-facing digital health interventions on patient safety outcomes: a meta-analysis of meta-analyses.Oxford open digital health · 2026Review
- Trends and effectiveness of digital health management in postdischarge coronary artery disease across COVID19 pandemic.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation intervention on risk factors, recurrent hospitalization and mortality.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Review and Comparative Evaluation of Mobile Apps for Cardiovascular Risk Estimation: Usability Evaluation Using mHealth App Usability Questionnaire.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Review
- Unmasking the Complex Interplay of Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome, Heart Failure, and Sleep Dysfunction: A Physiological and Psychological Perspective in a Digital Health World.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Health Literacy, Individual and Community Engagement, and Cardiovascular Risks and Disparities:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Upgrading Care: Digital Cardiology Interventions to Reduce Risk.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of mobile health (mHealth, wireless communication devices, and/or software technologies) in health care delivery has increased rapidly in recent years. Their integration into disease management programs (DMPs) has tremendous potential to improve outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), yet a more robust evaluation of the evidence is required. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of mHealth-enabled DMPs to determine their effectiveness in reducing readmissions and mortality in patients with CAD. Methods: We systematically searched English language studies from January 1, 2007, to August 3, 2021, in multiple databases. Studies comparing mHealth-enabled DMPs with standard DMPs without mHealth were included if they had a minimum 30-day follow-up for at least one of all-cause or cardiovascular-related mortality, readmissions, or major adverse cardiovascular events. Results: Of the 3,411 references from our search, 155 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and data were extracted from 18 publications. Pooled findings for all-cause readmissions (10 studies, n = 1,514) and cardiac-related readmissions (9 studies, n = 1,009) indicated that mHealth-enabled DMPs reduced all-cause (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91) and cardiac-related hospitalizations (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44-0.68) and emergency department visits (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.26-0.54) compared to DMPs without mHealth. There was no significant reduction for mortality outcomes (RR: 1.72; 95% CI: 0.64-4.64) or major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.40-1.15). Conclusions: DMPs integrated with mHealth should be considered an effective intervention for better outcomes in patients with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.