ReviewFrontiers in toxicology2024
Applying new approach methodologies to assess next-generation tobacco and nicotine products.
Review in Frontiers in toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From prediction to adaptation: rethinking the epistemic role of inhalation toxicology.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Editorial: Application of new approach methodologies in toxicological assessment of next-generation tobacco and nicotine products.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Strengthening Tobacco Product Regulation: Addressing Challenges and Strategies for Articles 9 and 10 Implementation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Next-generation high-throughput in vitro exposure system for early hazard ranking and comparative assessment of cigarette smoke and heated tobacco aerosols.Environmental sciences Europe · 2025Article
- Review
- Monocyte migration assay using a vascular-on-a-chip model and its utilization for the evaluation of a heated tobacco product.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.