ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
CapsEnhancer: An Effective Computational Framework for Identifying Enhancers Based on Chaos Game Representation and Capsule Network.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ANIA: an inception-attention network for predicting minimum inhibitory concentration of antimicrobial peptides.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Vertex Assignment for Frequency Chaos Game Representation of Proteins Affects Classification Performance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- The role of the cardiac lymphatic system in heart failure "reverse remodeling": from developmental signals to druggable targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Autophagy: mechanisms, roles in human diseases, and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
- DeepBP: Ensemble deep learning strategy for bioactive peptide prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancers are a class of noncoding DNA, serving as crucial regulatory elements in governing gene expression by binding to transcription factors. The identification of enhancers holds paramount importance in the field of biology. However, traditional experimental methods for enhancer identification demand substantial human and material resources. Consequently, there is a growing interest in employing computational methods for enhancer prediction. In this study, we propose a two-stage framework based on deep learning, termed CapsEnhancer, for the identification of enhancers and their strengths. CapsEnhancer utilizes chaos game representation to encode DNA sequences into unique images and employs a capsule network to extract local and global features from sequence "images". Experimental results demonstrate that CapsEnhancer achieves state-of-the-art performance in both stages. In the first and second stages, the accuracy surpasses the previous best methods by 8 and 3.5%, reaching accuracies of 94.5 and 95%, respectively. Notably, this study represents the pioneering application of computer vision methods to enhancer identification tasks. Our work not only contributes novel insights to enhancer identification but also provides a fresh perspective for other biological sequence analysis tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.