Article in Endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Jitu W GeorgeOlson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-4422
Rosa A CancinoOlson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Jennifer L Griffin MillerOlson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Fang QiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Qishan LinRNA Epitranscriptomics and Proteomics Resource, Department of Chemistry, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
M Jordan RowleyDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Varghese M ChennathukuzhiDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
John S DavisOlson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-4079
Funding
UNMC Structural Biology CoreP20GM103427 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAUL L SORGEN · 2012 to 2026
$59.2M
UNMC Histology/Imaging and Creighton University Imaging Core FacilityP30GM110768 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHELLEY D · 2014 to 2018
$5.1M
REST/NRSF, miRNAs, and tissue remodeling in adenomyosis pathophysiologyR01HD105714 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENNATHUKUZHI, VARGHEESE MANI, NOTHNICK, WARREN B · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Fine-Scale Genome Folding Relative to Transcription and LocationR35GM147467 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael Jordan Rowley · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
The role of REST in the pathogenesis of uterine fibroidsR01HD076450 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENNATHUKUZHI, VARGHEESE MANI · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
REST-MED12 Pathways in the Regulation of Estrogen - Progesterone Sensitivity in Uterine LeiomyomaR01HD113717 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Vargheese Mani Chennathukuzhi, ALEKSANDAR RAJKOVIC · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
Metabolic Regulators of Corpus Luteum FunctionR01HD092263 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVIS, JOHN S · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Metabolic Events Controlling Ovarian SteroidogenesisR01HD087402 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVIS, JOHN S · 2017 to 2019
$425k
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF THE SEX-LETHAL GENE IN DROSOPHILAF32GM012767 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SAMUELS, MARK E · 1988 to 1989
–
BLRD Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6BX005797 · VA · OMAHA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHN S DAVIS · 2022 to 2026
–
Signals controlling tissues homeostasis in the ovaryI01BX004272 · VA · OMAHA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVIS, JOHN S · 2020 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004272BLRD VA IK6 BX005797National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIGMS R35GM147467NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076450NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092263NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105714NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD113717NIFA 2017-67015-26450NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103427NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110768NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147467NIH HHS R01 HD087402NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences R00-GM12767Olson Center for Women's HealthSRI and Bayer Discovery/Innovation GrantVA I01 BX004272VA Senior Research Career Scientist Award IK6BX005797
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Uterine leiomyoma or fibroids are prevalent noncancerous tumors of the uterine muscle layer, yet their origin and development remain poorly understood. We analyzed RNA expression profiles of 15 epigenetic mediators in uterine fibroids compared to myometrium using publicly available RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. To validate our findings, we performed RT-qPCR on a separate cohort of uterine fibroids targeting these modifiers confirming our RNA-seq data. We then examined protein profiles of key N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifiers in fibroids and their matched myometrium, showing no significant differences in concordance with our RNA expression profiles. To determine RNA modification abundance, mRNA and small RNA from fibroids and matched myometrium were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry identifying prevalent m6A and 11 other known modifiers. However, no aberrant expression in fibroids was detected. We then mined a previously published dataset and identified differential expression of m6A modifiers that were specific to fibroid genetic subtype. Our analysis also identified m6A consensus motifs on genes previously identified to be dysregulated in uterine fibroids. Overall, using state-of-the-art mass spectrometry, RNA expression, and protein profiles, we characterized and identified differentially expressed m6A modifiers in relation to driver mutations. Despite the use of several different approaches, we identified limited differential expression of RNA modifiers and associated modifications in uterine fibroids. However, considering the highly heterogenous genomic and cellular nature of fibroids, and the possible contribution of single molecule m6A modifications to fibroid pathology, there is a need for greater in-depth characterization of m6A marks and modifiers in a larger and diverse patient cohort.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Characterization of m6A Modifiers and RNA Modifications in Uterine Fibroids. · full record | Socratic