Evidence mapPaperPMID 38947171Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2024

Proteomic profiling of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Impact of isolation methods on protein cargo.

Morteza Abyadeh, Shahab Mirshahvaladi, Sara Assar Kashani, Joao A Paulo, Ardeshir Amirkhani, Fatemeh Mehryab, Homeyra Seydi, Niloufar Moradpour, Sheyda Jodeiryjabarzade, Mehdi Mirzaei and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Extracellular Vesicles and the Gartner Hype Cycle.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Reply to: Letter to Editor by Saravanan Sampoornam et al.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Morteza AbyadehDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-7142
Shahab MirshahvaladiMacquarie Medical School, School of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-6155
Sara Assar KashaniDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR Tehran Iran.
Joao A PauloDepartment of Cell Biology Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ardeshir AmirkhaniAustralian Proteome Analysis Facility Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Fatemeh MehryabAdvanced Therapy Medicinal Product Technology Development Center, Cell Science Research Center Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR Tehran Iran.
Homeyra SeydiAdvanced Therapy Medicinal Product Technology Development Center, Cell Science Research Center Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR Tehran Iran.
Niloufar MoradpourDepartment of Biology University of Science and Culture Tehran Iran.
Sheyda JodeiryjabarzadeDepartment of Biology University of Science and Culture Tehran Iran.
Mehdi MirzaeiMacquarie Medical School, School of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Vivek GuptaMacquarie Medical School, School of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Faezeh ShekariDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5412
Ghasem Hosseini SalekdehFaculty of Natural Sciences Macquarie University North Ryde New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized vesicles with a lipid bilayer that are secreted by cells and play a critical role in cell-to-cell communication. Despite the promising reports regarding their diagnostic and therapeutic potential, the utilization of EVs in the clinical setting is limited due to insufficient information about their cargo and a lack of standardization in isolation and analysis methods. Considering protein cargos in EVs as key contributors to their therapeutic potency, we conducted a tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative proteomics analysis of three subpopulations of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived EVs obtained through three different isolation techniques: ultracentrifugation (UC), high-speed centrifugation (HS), and ultracentrifugation on sucrose cushion (SU). Subsequently, we checked EV marker expression, size distribution, and morphological characterization, followed by bioinformatic analysis. The bioinformatic analysis of the proteome results revealed that these subpopulations exhibit distinct molecular and functional characteristics. The choice of isolation method impacts the proteome of isolated EVs by isolating different subpopulations of EVs. Specifically, EVs isolated through the high-speed centrifugation (HS) method exhibited a higher abundance of ribosomal and mitochondrial proteins. Functional apoptosis assays comparing isolated mitochondria with EVs isolated through different methods revealed that HS-EVs, but not other EVs, induced early apoptosis in cancer cells. On the other hand, EVs isolated using the sucrose cushion (SU) and ultracentrifugation (UC) methods demonstrated a higher abundance of proteins primarily involved in the immune response, cell-cell interactions and extracellular matrix interactions. Our analyses unveil notable disparities in proteins and associated biological functions among EV subpopulations, underscoring the importance of meticulously selecting isolation methods and resultant EV subpopulations based on the intended application.

Indexed as

extracellular vesiclesisolationmitochondriaproteomics

Identifiers

PMID38947171
PMCPMC11212298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.