Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947374›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2024

A Comprehensive Review of Microbial Biofilms on Contact Lenses: Challenges and Solutions.

Adela Voinescu, Monica Licker, Delia Muntean, Corina Musuroi, Silvia Ioana Musuroi, Oana Izmendi, Silvana Vulpie, Romanita Jumanca, Mihnea Munteanu, Andrei Cosnita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adela VoinescuDoctoral School "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Monica LickerDepartment of Microbiology, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9245-5883
Delia MunteanDepartment of Microbiology, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Corina MusuroiDepartment of Microbiology, Multidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Silvia Ioana MusuroiDoctoral School "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Oana IzmendiDoctoral School "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-8109
Silvana VulpieDoctoral School "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Romanita JumancaRomanian and Foreign Languages Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2136-5493
Mihnea MunteanuDepartment IX, Surgery and Ophthalmology "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Andrei CosnitaDepartment IX, Surgery and Ophthalmology "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-6141-0198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact lenses (CL) have become an immensely popular means of vision correction, offering comfort to millions worldwide. However, the persistent issue of biofilm formation on lenses raises significant problems, leading to various ocular complications and discomfort. The aim of this review is to develop safer and more effective strategies for preventing and managing microbial biofilms on CL, improving the eye health and comfort of wearers. Taking these into consideration, the present study investigates the intricate mechanisms of biofilm formation, by exploring the interplay between microbial adhesion, the production of extracellular polymeric substances, and the properties of the lens material itself. Moreover, it emphasizes the diverse range of microorganisms involved, encompassing bacteria, fungi, and other opportunistic pathogens, elucidating their implications within lenses and other medical device-related infections and inflammatory responses. Going beyond the challenges posed by biofilms on CL, this work explores the advancements in biofilm detection techniques and their clinical relevance. It discusses diagnostic tools like confocal microscopy, genetic assays, and emerging technologies, assessing their capacity to identify and quantify biofilm-related infections. Finally, the paper delves into contemporary strategies and innovative approaches for managing and preventing biofilms development on CL. In Conclusion, this review provides insights for eye care practitioners, lens manufacturers, and microbiology researchers. It highlights the intricate interactions between biofilms and CL, serving as a foundation for the development of effective preventive measures and innovative solutions to enhance CL safety, comfort, and overall ocular health. Research into microbial biofilms on CL is continuously evolving, with several future directions being explored to address challenges and improve eye health outcomes as far as CL wearers are concerned.

Indexed as

geneticmicrobial keratitismicroscopyPseudomonasStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID38947374
PMCPMC11214797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.