Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38947687›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Microwave Ablation for Osteoid Osteoma in a Young Patient: A Case Report.

Elijah Skarlus Doelakeh, Induni N Weerarathna, Anurag Luharia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elijah Skarlus DoelakehAnesthesia, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Induni N WeerarathnaBiomedical Sciences, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Anurag LuhariaRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a common benign ossifying lesion that is most prevalent among youth. Usually, it attacks the diaphyseal or metaphyseal bones that are tubular. The common hallmark of muscle pain is the reported occurrence of night pain that is nearly always present, yields satisfactory responses from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and may be joined by complaints regarding physical activities. Also, it shows typical signs of study procedures like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A nidus, which is the primary marker in the diagnostic formation of shadowed images, is a crucial sign of an OO. This source is usually portrayed as an oval lytic lesion, measuring 1 cm flat and surrounded by a region of reactive ossification. It is laborious to diagnose OO since the condition is frequently confused with many other ones, and testing and therapy may be delayed and complicated as a result. There are still few studies on OO diagnosis and distinguishing of surrogate conditions. Unfortunately, either ablation or resection can be said to be the cure. Improved detection of OO shows the possibility for prompt diagnosis, fewer patient discomfort and side effects, less cost involved in unnecessary treatments, and a rightly diagnosed condition.

Indexed as

computed tomography (ct)minimally invasiveosteoid osteomaradiofrequency ablationrural healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38947687
PMCPMC11214646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.