ArticleCureus2024
Navigating Treatment Choices for Stress and Urgency Urinary Incontinence Using Graph Theory in Discrete Mathematics.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Laser Treatment on Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- Discrete mathematical network analysis bridging clinical vocabulary and patient discourse in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome online communications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Laser treatment for urinary incontinence in elite female athletes analyzed using a discrete mathematics approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unsupervised clustering analysis of treatment strategies for elite female athletes with severe stress urinary incontinence: focusing on competition return and SUI improvement.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Article
- Ninjin'yoeito in the Management of Frailty and Overactive Bladder in Elderly Women: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we propose a method for navigating the choice of treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) using graph theory in discrete mathematics. Our previous study accumulated data from 150 patients who underwent tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), transobturator tape (TOT), and vaginal non-ablation Erbium YAG laser (VEL) surgeries between 2014 and 2016. Network diagrams were created using this data. The treatments TVT, TOT, and VEL, along with patient characteristics (1-hour pad test: 1-hrPadTest, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score: OABSS), were represented as nodes and edges in the network diagram. We then employed a heuristic function to select the optimal treatment method for the patients with SUI and UUI. This process enables medical professionals to easily navigate the data for patients with both SUI and UUI concerns by calculating the shortest path connecting the 1-hrPadTest and OABSS. These results, which are consistent with those of previous studies, suggest that VEL is the optimal treatment. Unlike previous studies that employed statistical knowledge that is challenging for patients to understand, our study aids patients in visually comprehending and developing a customized treatment plan. This approach introduces a novel perspective for clinical decision-making in the treatment of urinary incontinence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply discrete mathematics to patient decision-making for urinary incontinence treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.