ArticleJAMA network open2024
Gender-Affirming Hormone Treatment and Metabolic Syndrome Among Transgender Veterans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Body mass index and body composition changes in transgender people undergoing gender-affirming hormone therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Nutritional Monitoring During Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: Body Composition and Metabolic Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Changes in cardiometabolic risk factors in transmasculine individuals over 10 years of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Novel Synthetic Steroid Derivatives: Target Prediction and Biological Evaluation of Antiandrogenic Activity.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Inclusive Nutrition Care for LGBT+ Patients: Challenges and Opportunities for Dietitians-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Among Veterans by Gender Identity: A Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Cross-Sex Hormone Therapy Is Associated With Loss of Circadian Rhythm in the Male Rat.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Article
- Doing Justice: Ethical Considerations Identifying and Researching Transgender and Gender Diverse People in Insurance Claims Data.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- Transgender Health: A Metabolic Wake-Up Call.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) is a common therapy for transgender individuals to reduce gender dysphoria and improve quality of life. Clarifying the long-term effects of GAHT remains a priority in transgender health research. Objective: To explore whether sex hormones (estradiol and testosterone) are associated with the development of metabolic syndrome in transgender veterans compared with cisgender veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes for gender dysphoria from the Veterans Health Administration national database to identify transfeminine and transmasculine veterans receiving documented feminizing (estradiol) or masculinizing (testosterone) treatment from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, and for whom the GAHT initiation date and metabolic syndrome component-related data were available. Transgender veterans were matched to cisgender referents. Exposure: Gender-affirming hormone treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Metabolic syndrome z-scores were calculated based on body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood glucose. Changes in mean z-scores were compared among the transgender and cisgender groups before and after the index date (corresponding to GAHT initiation) using a repeated-measures analysis of variance model. Results: The cohort included 1290 participants: 645 transgender (494 [38.3%] transfeminine, 151 [11.7%] transmasculine) and 645 cisgender (280 [21.7%] female, 365 [28.3%] male). Mean (SD) age at the index date was 41.3 (13.2) years. Metabolic syndrome z-scores changed significantly over time and differed significantly across groups. Overall, transmasculine veterans had the greatest percentage increase in mean (SEM) z-scores after vs before the index date (298.0% [57.0%]; P < .001), followed by cisgender females (108.3% [27.5%]; P < .001), cisgender males (49.3% [27.5%]; P = .02), and transfeminine persons (3.0% [10.7%]; P = .77). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, in both cisgender and transgender veterans, estradiol was associated with reduced metabolic syndrome risk, whereas testosterone was associated with increased risk. However, transmasculine individuals had the greatest risk and transfeminine individuals had the lowest risk of metabolic syndrome associated with these hormones. This is relevant for the management of metabolic syndrome risk factors in cisgender and transgender individuals and to potentially predict the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, systolic hypertension, insulin resistance, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.