Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38955674›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2025

Understanding Kenyan policymakers' perspectives about the introduction of new maternal vaccines.

Rupali J Limaye, Berhaun Fesshaye, Prachi Singh, Rose Jalang'o, Rosemary Njura Njogu, Emily Miller, Jessica Schue, Molly Sauer, Clarice Lee, Ruth A Karron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3883-9720
Berhaun FesshayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2868-4187
Prachi SinghDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6013-1916
Rose Jalang'oNational Vaccines and Immunization Program, Ministry of Health Kenya, Afya House, Cathedral Road, P. O. Box 43319-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rosemary Njura NjoguJhpiego Kenya, 2nd Floor, Arlington Block, 12 Riverside, off Riverside Drive, P.O. Box 66119-00800, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emily MillerDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4395-7588
Jessica SchueDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Molly SauerDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Clarice LeeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Ruth A KarronDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-016977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New vaccine policy adoption is a complex process, especially in low-and-middle-income countries, requiring country policymakers to navigate challenges such as competing priorities, human and financial resource constraints, and limited logistical capacity. Since the beginning of the Expanded Programme on Immunization, most new vaccine introductions under this structure have not been aimed at adult populations. The majority of adult vaccines offered under the Expanded Programme on Immunization are not typically tested among and tailored for pregnant persons, except those that are specifically recommended for pregnancy. Given that new maternal vaccines, including respiratory syncytial virus and group B streptococcus vaccines, are on the horizon, it is important to understand what barriers may arise during the policy development and vaccine introduction process. In this study, we sought to understand information needs among maternal immunization policymakers and decision-makers in Kenya for new vaccine maternal policy adoption through in-depth interviews with 20 participants in Nakuru and Mombasa, counties in Kenya. Results were mapped to an adapted version of an established framework focused on new vaccine introduction in low-and-middle-income countries. Participants reported that the policy process for new maternal vaccine introduction requires substantial evidence as well as coordination among diverse stakeholders. Importantly, our findings suggest that the process for new maternal vaccines does not end with the adoption of a new policy, as intended recipients and various actors can determine the success of a vaccine programme. Previous shortcomings, in Kenya, and globally during human papillomavirus vaccine introduction, show the need to allocate adequate resources in education of communities given the sensitive target group. With maternal vaccines targeting a sensitive group-pregnant persons-in the pipeline, it is an opportune time to understand how to ensure successful vaccine introduction with optimal acceptance and uptake, while also addressing vaccine hesitancy to increase population benefit.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelHealth PolicyImmunization ProgramsPolicy MakingVaccinationVaccinesAdultFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancyVaccinesimmunizationmaternal and child healthPolicypolicy process

Identifiers

PMID38955674
PMCPMC11724633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.