ReviewCureus2024
A Comparison of Rosuvastatin Monotherapy and Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Combination Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular outcomes and adverse drug reactions associated with the use of ezetimibe in combination with a statin in diabetes mellitus patients with higher risk for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Real-World Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin-Ezetimibe Single Pill (RovazetJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Lipid profile and safety of rosuvastatin monotherapy versus rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe in high risk coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic condition where vascular inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to disease progression and associated complications. Although statins are recommended for managing dyslipidemia in diabetes, additional therapies are often required to achieve target lipid levels. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rosuvastatin monotherapy versus combination therapy with ezetimibe in patients with type 2 diabetes. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases until April 2024, identifying six randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that the rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe combination resulted in significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol (mean difference, or MD: 19.49; 95% CI: 13.99 to 24.99), triglycerides (MD: 13.44; 95% CI: 2.04 to 24.85), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: -17.68; 95% CI: 12.85 to 22.51) compared to rosuvastatin monotherapy. Conversely, rosuvastatin monotherapy achieved a greater reduction in HbA1c levels (MD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.17 to -0.04). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that using the same dose of rosuvastatin in both groups led to more significant improvements in lipid parameters with lower heterogeneity. The findings suggest that the rosuvastatin-ezetimibe combination may be a more effective lipid-lowering strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes, though larger studies are needed to assess long-term safety and optimal dosing. Additionally, while rosuvastatin monotherapy provided modest HbA1c reductions, the clinical relevance remains uncertain, and potential risks with high-dose statins should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.