Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958002›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2025

A new method of pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective analysis of 93 cases.

Junhan Li, Jianqiang Xiang, Jie Zhu, Mengnan Wang, Meng Lin, Haibiao Wang, Hong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junhan LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jianqiang XiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jie ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Mengnan WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Meng LinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Haibiao WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreaticojejunostomy have been studied and modified for more than a hundred years. We investigated a new method of pancreaticojejunostomy to explore its value in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 93 patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with 'Shunt-block combined' pancreaticojejunostomy at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital from April 2017 to February 2023.

resultsAll patients successfully completed the surgery, with two cases requiring conversion to open surgery. The average operation time was 328.5 (180-532) min, the average intraoperative blood loss was 182.9 (50-1000) mL and the average laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy time was 29.6 (20-39) min. There were no cases of grade C pancreatic fistula postoperatively, 10 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula, 43 cases of biochemical fistula and 40 cases without detected pancreatic fistula.

conclusion'Shunt-block combined' pancreaticojejunostomy was a safe and effective method for pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Identifiers

PMID38958002
PMCPMC11838803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.