Evidence mapPaperPMID 38958683Full record

SynthesisIrish journal of medical science2024

The effect of Empagliflozin on echocardiographic parameters in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Adel Mouffokes, Youssef Soliman, Basma Ehab Amer, Tungki Pratama Umar, Ahmed Reda Gonnah, Mohamed Hatem Ellabban, Basel Abdelazeem

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adel MouffokesFaculty of Medicine, University of Oran Ahmed Ben Bella 1, Oran, Algeria. adelmouffokes31@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-8110
Youssef SolimanFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4204-3706
Basma Ehab AmerFaculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-5508
Tungki Pratama UmarFaculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8096
Ahmed Reda GonnahImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-0198
Mohamed Hatem EllabbanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0012-3574
Basel AbdelazeemDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-6196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk of cardiovascular events, particularly acute myocardial infarction (MI). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) can improve cardiac outcomes among heart failure individuals, however, the effects on acute myocardial infarction remain unclear. This meta-analysis investigates the impact of empagliflozin in diabetic patients following acute myocardial infarction. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science through August 10th, 2023. We included studies comparing empagliflozin versus placebo in diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction. We used Revman to report the data as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and our effect size with a random effects model. Additionally, we performed Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to test the robustness of the results. The study protocol was published on PROSPERO with ID: CRD42023447733. Five studies with a total of 751 patients were included in our analysis. Empagliflozin was effective to improve LVEF% (MD: 1.80, 95% CI [0.50, 3.10], p = 0.007), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (MD: -9.93, 95% CI [-16.07, -3.80], p = 0.002), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (MD: -7.91, 95% CI [-11.93, -3.88], p = 0.0001). However, there was no difference between empagliflozin and placebo groups in terms of NT-pro BNP (MD: - 136.59, 95% CI [-293.43, 20.25], p = 0.09), and HbA1c (MD: -0.72, 95% CI [-1.73, 0.29], p = 0.16). Additionally, empagliflozin did not prevent hospitalization due to heart failure (RR: 0.59, 95% CI [0.16, 2.24], p = 0.44, I-squared = 0%), and mortality (RR: 1.34, 95% CI [0.15,11.90], p = 0.79, I-squared = 25%). Empagliflozin initiation in diabetic patients following acute MI may improve echocardiographic parameters. However, empagliflozin might not be effective in heart failure prevention and optimal glycemic control in this patient population. Further large-scale trials are warranted to ascertain our findings.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsEchocardiographyGlucosidesMyocardial InfarctionSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainStroke VolumeBenzhydryl CompoundsempagliflozinGlucosidesNatriuretic Peptide, BrainSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAcute myocardial infarctionDiabetes mellitusEmpagliflozinSGLT2i

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.