Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38958924›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2024

Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?

Yasser A Jamil, Rachel Cohen, Dana K Alameddine, Salil V Deo, Manish Kumar, Ariela R Orkaby

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasser A JamilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Rachel CohenTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dana K AlameddineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Salil V DeoCleveland VA Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Manish KumarAlbert Einstien College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Ariela R OrkabyNew England GRECC (Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S Huntington St, Boston, MA, 02130, USA. aorkaby@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCurrent guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies. RECENT

findingsThe relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, LDLAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentSecondary PreventionAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAgingCardiovascular DiseasesDyslipidemiaLipid lowering therapyPrimary PreventionSecondary Prevention

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.