Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38961413›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating in disadvantaged adults living in the UK: a scoping review.

Raluca A Briazu, Fatima Masood, Louise Hunt, Clare Pettinger, Carol Wagstaff, Rachel McCloy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping the Healthiness of Community Food Environments and Their Association With the Socioeconomic Index for Areas (SEIFA) in the South Coast of NSW.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Key action areas for transforming the UK food system: insights from the Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Programme project portfolio.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Addressing food system determinants of health inequalities in urban environments: learnings from the FoodSEqual and FoodSEqual-Health projects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Fork to farm: reverse engineering a food system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raluca A BriazuSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-1261
Fatima MasoodSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Louise HuntFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Clare PettingerFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-9463
Carol WagstaffDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-8641
Rachel McCloySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK. r.a.mccloy@reading.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-9640

Funding

UK Research and Innovation BB/V004905/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the UK people living in disadvantaged communities are less likely than those with higher socio-economic status to have a healthy diet. To address this inequality, it is crucial scientists, practitioners and policy makers understand the factors that hinder and assist healthy food choice in these individuals. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to healthy eating among disadvantaged individuals living in the UK. Additionally, we used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to synthesise results and provide a guide for the development of theory-informed behaviour change interventions. Five databases were searched, (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) for articles assessing healthy dietary intake of disadvantaged adults living in the UK. A total of 50 papers (34 quantitative; 16 qualitative) were included in this review. Across all studies we identified 78 barriers and 49 facilitators found to either impede and/or encourage healthy eating. Both barriers and facilitators were more commonly classified under the Environmental, Context and Resources TDF domain, with 74% of studies assessing at least one factor pertaining to this domain. Results thus indicate that context related factors such as high cost and accessibility of healthy food, rather than personal factors, such as lack of efficiency in healthy lifestyle drive unhealthy eating in disadvantaged individuals in the UK. We discuss how such factors are largely overlooked in current interventions and propose that more effort should be directed towards implementing interventions that specifically target infrastructures rather than individuals.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyVulnerable PopulationsAdultHumansUnited KingdomDietary intakeEnvironmental barriersScoping reviewSocioeconomic deprivationTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID38961413
PMCPMC11221142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.