Evidence mapPaperPMID 38962008Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Integrated analysis of single-cell RNA-seq, bulk RNA-seq, Mendelian randomization, and eQTL reveals T cell-related nomogram model and subtype classification in rheumatoid arthritis.

Qiang Ding, Qingyuan Xu, Yini Hong, Honghai Zhou, Xinyu He, Chicheng Niu, Zhao Tian, Hao Li, Ping Zeng, Jinfu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiang Ding *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Qingyuan Xu *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yini HongGynecology Department, The First People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Honghai ZhouFaculty of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xinyu HeThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Chicheng NiuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Zhao TianThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Hao LiThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Traditional Chinesen Medical University, Nanning, China.
Ping ZengDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangxi, China.
Jinfu LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic disease that attacks the joints and causes a heavy economic burden on humans worldwide. T cells regulate RA progression and are considered crucial targets for therapy. Therefore, we aimed to integrate multiple datasets to explore the mechanisms of RA. Moreover, we established a T cell-related diagnostic model to provide a new method for RA immunotherapy. Methods: scRNA-seq and bulk-seq datasets for RA were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Various methods were used to analyze and characterize the T cell heterogeneity of RA. Using Mendelian randomization (MR) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), we screened for potential pathogenic T cell marker genes in RA. Subsequently, we selected an optimal machine learning approach by comparing the nine types of machine learning in predicting RA to identify T cell-related diagnostic features to construct a nomogram model. Patients with RA were divided into different T cell-related clusters using the consensus clustering method. Finally, we performed immune cell infiltration and clinical correlation analyses of T cell-related diagnostic features. Results: By analyzing the scRNA-seq dataset, we obtained 10,211 cells that were annotated into 7 different subtypes based on specific marker genes. By integrating the eQTL from blood and RA GWAS, combined with XGB machine learning, we identified a total of 8 T cell-related diagnostic features (MIER1, PPP1CB, ICOS, GADD45A, CD3D, SLFN5, PIP4K2A, and IL6ST). Consensus clustering analysis showed that RA could be classified into two different T-cell patterns (Cluster 1 and Cluster 2), with Cluster 2 having a higher T-cell score than Cluster 1. The two clusters involved different pathways and had different immune cell infiltration states. There was no difference in age or sex between the two different T cell patterns. In addition, ICOS and IL6ST were negatively correlated with age in RA patients. Conclusion: Our findings elucidate the heterogeneity of T cells in RA and the communication role of these cells in an RA immune microenvironment. The construction of T cell-related diagnostic models provides a resource for guiding RA immunotherapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidMendelian Randomization AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningNomogramsSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisT-Lymphocytesbulk RNA sequencingcombined biomarkersmachine learningMendelian randomizationrheumatoid arthritissingle-cell RNA sequencingT cells

Identifiers

PMID38962008
PMCPMC11219584

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.