ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2024
Application of spatial-omics to the classification of kidney biopsy samples in transplantation.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation kidney tissue analysis - spatial omics and digital pathology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Review
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Spatial metabolomics and multiomics integration for breakthroughs in precision medicine for kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Gut microbial-derived metabolites: key players in kidney disease and renal fibrosis.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Two decades of nephrology research: progress and future challenges.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Article
- Reshaping transplantation with AI, emerging technologies and xenotransplantation.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Imaging and spatially resolved mass spectrometry applications in nephrology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Integrating genetic and immune profiles for personalized immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Integrated Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals a Pathological Niche Formed by FAP+ Fibroblasts, Immune, and Endothelial Cells in Psoriatic Lesions.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of allorecognition and xenorecognition in transplantation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improvement of long-term outcomes through targeted treatment is a primary concern in kidney transplant medicine. Currently, the validation of a rejection diagnosis and subsequent treatment depends on the histological assessment of allograft biopsy samples, according to the Banff classification system. However, the lack of (early) disease-specific tissue markers hinders accurate diagnosis and thus timely intervention. This challenge mainly results from an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying late allograft failure. Integration of large-scale multimodal approaches for investigating allograft biopsy samples might offer new insights into this pathophysiology, which are necessary for the identification of novel therapeutic targets and the development of tailored immunotherapeutic interventions. Several omics technologies - including transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomic tools (and multimodal data analysis strategies) - can be applied to allograft biopsy investigation. However, despite their successful application in research settings and their potential clinical value, several barriers limit the broad implementation of many of these tools into clinical practice. Among spatial-omics technologies, mass spectrometry imaging, which is under-represented in the transplant field, has the potential to enable multi-omics investigations that might expand the insights gained with current clinical analysis technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38965417What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.