ArticleEquine veterinary journal2025
Characterisation of phenotypic patterns in equine exercise-associated myopathies.
Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic idiopathic myopathy in Icelandic horses: A case series.Equine veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Characterisation of phenotypic patterns in equine exercise-associated myopathies.Equine veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEquine exercise-associated myopathies are prevalent, clinically heterogeneous, generally idiopathic disorders characterised by episodes of myofibre damage that occur in association with exercise. Episodes are intermittent and vary within and between affected horses and across breeds. The aetiopathogenesis is often unclear; there might be multiple causes. Poor phenotypic characterisation hinders genetic and other disease analyses.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to characterise phenotypic patterns across exercise-associated myopathies in horses. STUDY
designHistorical cross-sectional study, with subsequent masked case-control validation study.
methodsHistorical clinical and histological features from muscle samples (n = 109) were used for k-means clustering and validated using principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering. For further validation, a blinded histological study (69 horses) was conducted comparing two phenotypic groups with selected controls and horses with histopathological features characterised by myofibrillar disruption.
resultsWe identified two distinct broad phenotypes: a non-classic exercise-associated myopathy syndrome (EAMS) subtype was associated with practitioner-described signs of apparent muscle pain (p < 0.001), reluctance to move (10.85, p = 0.001), abnormal gait (p < 0.001), ataxia (p = 0.001) and paresis (p = 0.001); while a non-specific classic RER subtype was not uniquely associated with any particular variables. No histological differences were identified between subtypes in the validation study, and no identifying histopathological features for other equine myopathies identified in either subtype. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Lack of an independent validation population; small sample size of smaller identified subtypes; lack of positive control myofibrillar myopathy cases; case descriptions derived from multiple independent and unblinded practitioners.
conclusionsThis is the first study using computational clustering methods to identify phenotypic patterns in equine exercise-associated myopathies, and suggests that differences in patterns of presenting clinical signs support multiple disease subtypes, with EAMS a novel subtype not previously described. Routine muscle histopathology was not helpful in sub-categorising the phenotypes in our population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.