ReviewChemical science2024
Engineering of bespoke photosensitiser-microbe interfaces for enhanced semi-artificial photosynthesis.
Review in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- To Biotic or Abiotic: Biohybrid Systems for Artificial Photosynthesis.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Analysis of lipid-assisted self-assembly of hydrophobic CuInSNanoscale · 2026Article
- Toward Solar-Powered Growth of AutotrophicJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Organic Materials for Biohybrid Photocatalysis and Photoelectrochemical Devices.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Designing Microbe-Semiconductor Interfaces for Semibiological Photosynthesis.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Operando Microscopy of Photosynthetic Microbial Biohybrids Using Fluorescent Chemical Probes.ACS electrochemistry · 2026Article
- Engineering a semi-artificial photosynthetic biofilm for robust and high-efficiency COChemical science · 2026Article
- Cross-scale design of abiotic-biotic interfaces for semi-artificial photosynthesis.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Photocatalytic Biohybrid Vesicles.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Single-atom bridges across biotic-abiotic interfaces facilitate direct electron transfer for solar-to-chemical conversion.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Redox and Energy Homeostasis Enabled by Photocatalytic Material-Microbial Interfaces.ACS nano · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biohybrid systems for solar fuel production integrate artificial light-harvesting materials with biological catalysts such as microbes. In this perspective, we discuss the rational design of the abiotic-biotic interface in biohybrid systems by reviewing microbes and synthetic light-harvesting materials, as well as presenting various approaches to coupling these two components together. To maximise performance and scalability of such semi-artificial systems, we emphasise that the interfacial design requires consideration of two important aspects: attachment and electron transfer. It is our perspective that rational design of this photosensitiser-microbe interface is required for scalable solar fuel production. The design and assembly of a biohybrid with a well-defined electron transfer pathway allows mechanistic characterisation and optimisation for maximum efficiency. Introduction of additional catalysts to the system can close the redox cycle, omitting the need for sacrificial electron donors. Studies that electronically couple light-harvesters to well-defined biological entities, such as emerging photosensitiser-enzyme hybrids, provide valuable knowledge for the strategic design of whole-cell biohybrids. Exploring the interactions between light-harvesters and redox proteins can guide coupling strategies when translated into larger, more complex microbial systems.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.