ArticleCureus2024
Morphometric Analysis of Placenta and Fetal Doppler Indices in Normal and High-Risk Pregnancies.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background High-risk pregnancies, encompassing pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia toxemia (PET), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), represent intricate medical challenges with potential repercussions for maternal and fetal health. This research undertakes a comprehensive comparative investigation into the variations of Doppler indices and placental parameters within the context of these high-risk conditions when juxtaposed against pregnancies characterized as normal. Methodology Employing a rigorous cross-sectional study design, a diverse cohort of pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes, IUGR, PIH, and preeclampsia was meticulously assembled. Additionally, a group of normal pregnant women served as the comparative reference. Doppler ultrasound assessments, viz, pulsatility index (PI), were carefully performed to estimate blood flow velocities within critical maternal and fetal vessels, while placental parameters were meticulously quantified, encompassing dimensions, vascular architecture, and morphological features. Results Except in the GDM group, all high-risk groups had reduced estimated placental weight and actual birth weight than normal pregnant women. All high-risk groups showed a highly significant elevation of the PI of the umbilical artery and PI of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) than normal but the PI of MCA was significantly reduced in the PET group than in normal individuals. The cerebro-placental ratio in the GDM and IUGR groups revealed markedly greater values, whereas PET showed lower values. IUGR and PIH groups showed a substantial reduction in the fetal birth weight. All high-risk groups (GDM, IUGR, PIH, and PET) showed a highly significant reduction in luminal area umbilical artery 1 than the normal pregnant women. In IUGR, marginal placental insertion was very high, followed by GDM and PET groups. Conclusions This study reveals that Doppler indices, placental parameters, newborn weight, and their related ratios may be utilized to anticipate gestation difficulties and gain insight into the pathophysiology of problematic conceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.