Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966480›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

An Overview of Appropriate Medical Practice and Preparedness in Radiation Emergency Response.

Akram Al-Ibraheem, Serin Moghrabi, Ahmed Abdlkadir, Heba Safi, Ziad Kazzi, Batool Al-Balooshi, Khaled Salman, Aysar Khalaf, Majdi Zein, Huda Al Naemi and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Nuclear Medicine in IRAQ: From a Pioneering Past to Future Progress.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Akram Al-IbraheemNuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, JOR.
Serin MoghrabiNuclear Medicine and PET/CT, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, JOR.
Ahmed AbdlkadirNuclear Medicine and PET/CT, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, JOR.
Heba SafiHealth and Environment Unit, World Health Organization, Amman, JOR.
Ziad KazziEmergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Batool Al-BalooshiNuclear medicine, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, ARE.
Khaled SalmanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT imaging, King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, SAU.
Aysar KhalafDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Warith International Cancer Institute, Karbala, IRQ.
Majdi ZeinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Assad University Hospital, Damascus, SYR.
Huda Al NaemiNuclear Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Hanan AldousariMolecular Imaging Department, Jaber Alahmad Center for Molecular Imaging, Kuwait City, KWT.
Layth Mula-HussainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ninevah University, Mosul, IRQ.
Malik JuweidDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JOR.
Jun HatazawaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics, Osaka University, Osaka, JPN.
Feras HawwariSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, JOR.
Asem MansourRadiology, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, JOR.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation emergencies involving high doses of nuclear radiation pose significant risks from exposure to ionizing radiation in various scenarios. These situations include transportation accidents involving radioactive materials, occupational exposure, nuclear detonations, dirty bombs, and nuclear power plant accidents. In addition to the immediate risks of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and related diseases, long-term exposure can increase the risk of other health issues such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and children, face particular concern due to potential impacts on their health and the health of unborn babies. The severity of ARS depends on several factors such as radiation dose, quality, dose rate, exposure uniformity, and individual biological responses. Bioindicators are biological responses or markers that help assess the severity and effects of radiation exposure on an individual. Bioindicators can include physical symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, or laboratory tests such as changes in blood cell counts and gene expression that can help in assessing and treating exposed individuals. Additionally, early prodromal symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhea, and erythema can provide important clues for diagnosis and treatment. Developing a comprehensive plan for radiation emergencies is vital for safeguarding public health, infrastructure, and the environment. First responders play a critical role in establishing safety perimeters, triage, and coordination with various stakeholders. Education and training are essential for medical personnel and the public. This article provides general recommendations and identifies challenges to effective radiation emergency preparedness and response.

Indexed as

contaminationpreparednesspublic healthradiation emergencyradiation medicineradiation practices

Identifiers

PMID38966480
PMCPMC11222772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.