ReviewSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Recent advances in protein precipitation-based methods for drug-target screening].
Review in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Label-Free Target Discovery Strategy for Natural Active Products.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug targets are biological macromolecules that bind drug molecules in vivo. Therefore, the system-wide identification of drug targets plays a vital role in fully understanding the mechanism of drug action, efficacy, and side effects. The unbiased screening of drug targets may accelerate the process of drug discovery and candidate screening. Mass spectrometry is a key tool for large-scale protein identification and accurate quantification owing to its high acquisition speed, resolution, and sensitivity. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been widely used for drug-target screening. It can systematically identify the protein-target landscape of a drug and elucidate drug-protein interactions. Commonly used drug-target characterization methods, such as labeling-based affinity enrichment, require the chemical derivatization of drug molecules, which is not only time-consuming but may also affect the affinity of the drug towards its targets. Furthermore, the spatial effects of the derivatization groups may block interactions between the drug and its targets. Considering the disadvantages of affinity-enrichment methods, strategies that do not require chemical derivatization have received widespread attention. Proteins may undergo denaturation, unfolding, and precipitation under different conditions such as high temperatures, extreme pH, denaturants, and mechanical stress. Binding to small-molecule drugs may alter the folding balance of target proteins. The conformational stability of target proteins can be stabilized by binding with drugs, and protein-drug complexes are more resistant than free proteins to the precipitation induced by different conditions. Based on this mechanism, various large-scale drug-target identification methods using protein precipitation have been developed by combining proteomics and mass spectrometry analysis, including thermal proteome profiling and solvent-, mechanical stress-, and pH-induced protein precipitation. These methods have been successfully applied to the characterization of small-molecule drug targets. In this review, we describe the protein precipitation-based methods used for the high-throughput discovery of drug targets and elucidation of the interactions between drugs and proteins in the past decade. We also summarize the characteristics of each method and discuss their application potential in drug-efficacy evaluation and drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.