Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967966›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2024

Exploring How Youth Use TikTok for Mental Health Information in British Columbia: Semistructured Interview Study With Youth.

Roxanne Turuba, Willow Cormier, Rae Zimmerman, Nikki Ow, Marco Zenone, Yuri Quintana, Emily Jenkins, Shelly Ben-David, Alicia Raimundo, Alessandro R Marcon and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Public Health Perils of Search Engine Marketing: Insights for Research and Regulation.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Roxanne TurubaDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5355-7932
Willow CormierDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-2557-1591
Rae ZimmermanDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-3073-1807
Nikki OwDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-8052
Marco ZenoneDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-6070
Yuri QuintanaDivision of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-0257
Emily JenkinsSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4649-2904
Shelly Ben-DavidSchool of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-2565
Alicia RaimundoFoundry, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-7976-6920
Alessandro R MarconHealth Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-423X
Steve MathiasDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-2200
Jo HendersonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-5193
Skye BarbicDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-2452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTikTok (ByteDance) experienced a surge in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as a way for people to interact with others, share experiences and thoughts related to the pandemic, and cope with ongoing mental health challenges. However, few studies have explored how youth use TikTok to learn about mental health.

objectiveThis study aims to understand how youth used TikTok during the COVID-19 pandemic to learn about mental health and mental health support.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 21 youths (aged 12-24 years) living in British Columbia, Canada, who had accessed TikTok for mental health information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using an inductive, data-driven approach.

resultsA total of 3 overarching themes were identified describing youth's experiences. The first theme centered on how TikTok gave youth easy access to mental health information and support, which was particularly helpful during the COVID-19 pandemic to curb the effects of social isolation and the additional challenges of accessing mental health services. The second theme described how the platform provided youth with connection, as it gave youth a safe space to talk about mental health and allowed them to feel seen by others going through similar experiences. This helped normalize and destigmatize conversations about mental health and brought awareness to various mental health conditions. Finally, the last theme focused on how this information led to action, such as trying different coping strategies, discussing mental health with peers and family, accessing mental health services, and advocating for themselves during medical appointments. Across the 3 themes, youth expressed having to be mindful of bias and misinformation, highlighting the barriers to identifying and reporting misinformation and providing individualized advice on the platform.

conclusionsFindings suggest that TikTok can be a useful tool to increase mental health awareness, reduce stigma, and encourage youth to learn and address their mental health challenges while providing a source of peer connection and support. Simultaneously, TikTok can adversely impact mental health through repetitive exposure to mentally distressing content and misleading diagnosis and treatment information. Regulations against harmful content are needed to mitigate these risks and make TikTok safer for youth. Efforts should also be made to increase media and health literacy among youth so that they can better assess the information they consume online.

Indexed as

COVID-19Interviews as TopicAdolescentBritish ColumbiaChildFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young Adultadolescentsmental healthqualitative researchsocial mediaTikTokyoung adultsyouth

Identifiers

PMID38967966
PMCPMC11259762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.