Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969991›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Socioeconomic determinants and reasons for non-acceptance to vaccination recommendations during the 3

Anna Sára Ligeti, Beatrix Oroszi, Csaba Luca, Edit Bilics, József Ágoston, Gergely Röst, Júlia Koltai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna Sára LigetiNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix OrosziNational Laboratory for Health Security, Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba LucaNational Laboratory for Health Security, Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Edit BilicsNational Laboratory for Health Security, Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
József ÁgostonCorvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely RöstNational Laboratory for Health Security, Bolyai Institute, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Júlia KoltaiNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. koltai.julia@tk.hu.

Funding

Hungarian National Laboratory for Health Security RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Hungary, although six types of vaccines were widely available, the percentage of people receiving the primary series of COVID-19 vaccination remained below the EU average. This paper investigates the reasons for Hungary's lower vaccination coverage by exploring changing attitudes towards vaccination, socio-demographic determinants, and individual reasons for non-acceptance during the 3

methodsThe study's empirical analysis is based on representative surveys conducted in Hungary between February 19, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The study used a total of 17 surveys, each with a sample size of at least 1000 respondents. Binomial logistic regression models were used to investigate which socio-demographic characteristics are most likely to influence vaccine hesitancy in Hungary. The study analysed 2506 open-ended responses to identify reasons for vaccine non-acceptance. The responses were categorised into four main categories and 13 sub-categories.

resultsBetween the third and fifth wave of the pandemic, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination have significantly changed. Although the proportion of vaccinated individuals has increased steadily, the percentage of individuals who reported not accepting the vaccine has remained almost unchanged. Socio-demographic characteristics were an important determinant of the observed vaccine hesitancy, although they remained relatively stable over time. Individuals in younger age groups and those with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to decline vaccination, while those living in the capital city were the least likely. A significant reason behind vaccine refusal can undoubtedly be identified as lack of trust (specifically distrust in science), facing an information barrier and the perception of low personal risk.

conclusionAlthough compulsory childhood vaccination coverage is particularly high in Hungary, voluntary adult vaccines, such as the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines, are less well accepted. Vaccine acceptance is heavily affected by the social-demographic characteristics of people. Mistrust and hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccines, if not well managed, can easily affect people's opinion and acceptance of other vaccines as well. Identifying and understanding the complexity of how vaccine hesitancy evolved during the pandemic can help to understand and halt the decline in both COVID-19 and general vaccine confidence by developing targeted public health programs to address these issues.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSocioeconomic FactorsVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Cross-sectional surveySocioeconomic determinantsVaccination hesitancyVaccine coverage

Identifiers

PMID38969991
PMCPMC11225232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.