ArticleAging2024
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with glioma: a population-based study.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe objective is to investigate the prognostic factors associated with gliomas and to develop and assess a predictive nomogram model connected to survival that may serve as an additional resource for the clinical management of glioma patients.
methodFrom 2010 to 2015, participants included in the study were chosen from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Gliomas were definitively diagnosed in each of them. They were divided into the training group and the validation cohort at random (7/3 ratio) using a random number table. To identify the independent predictive markers for overall survival (OS), Cox regression analysis was utilized. Subsequently, the training cohort's survival-related nomogram predictive model for OS was created by incorporating the fundamental patient attributes. Following that, the training cohort's model underwent internal validation. The nomogram model's authenticity and reliability were assessed through the computation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and concordance index (C-index). To evaluate the degree of agreement between the observed and predicted values in the training and validation cohorts, calibration plots were created.
resultAge, primary site, histological type, surgery, chemotherapy, marital status, and grade were the independent predictive factors for OS in the training cohort, according to Cox regression analysis. Moreover, the nomogram model for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS was built using these variables. The C-indexes of OS for glioma patients in the training cohort and internal validation cohort were found to be 0.779 (95% CI=0.769-0.789) and 0.776 (95% CI=0.760-0.792), respectively, according to the results. The ROC curves also demonstrated good discrimination. Additionally, calibration plots demonstrated a fair amount of agreement.
conclusionsIn summary, the nomogram prediction model of OS demonstrated a moderate level of reliability in its predictive performance, offering valuable reference data to enable doctors to quickly and easily determine the survival likelihood of patients with gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.