Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971925›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2024

"Filler-Associated Acute Stroke Syndrome": Classification, Predictive Modelling of Hyaluronidase Efficacy, and Updated Case Review on Neurological and Visual Complications.

Eqram Rahman, Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston, William Richard Webb, Parinitha Rao, Karim Sayed, A Q M Omar Sharif, Nanze Yu, Sotirios Ioannidis, Elias Tam, Zakia Rahman and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eqram RahmanResearch and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H9JQ, UK. Eqram.rahman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-8338
Wolfgang G Philipp-DormstonHautzentrum Koeln, Cologne, Germany.
William Richard WebbResearch and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H9JQ, UK.
Parinitha RaoThe Skin Address, Aesthetic Dermatology Practice, Bengaluru, India.
Karim SayedNomi Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
A Q M Omar SharifShaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Sher e Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nanze YuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sotirios IoannidisPlastic Surgery Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Elias TamEHA Clinic, Singapore, Singapore.
Zakia RahmanStanford Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Ash MosahebiRoyal Free Hospital, Hempstead, London, UK.
Greg J GoodmanMonash University, Clayton, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rising use of soft tissue fillers for aesthetic procedures has seen an increase in complications, including vascular occlusions and neurological symptoms that resemble stroke. This study synthesizes information on central nervous system (CNS) complications post-filler injections and evaluates the effectiveness of hyaluronidase (HYAL) treatment.

methodsA thorough search of multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, focused on publications from January 2014 to January 2024. Criteria for inclusion covered reviews and case reports that documented CNS complications related to soft tissue fillers. Advanced statistical and computational techniques, including logistic regression, machine learning, and Bayesian analysis, were utilized to dissect the factors influencing therapeutic outcomes.

resultsThe analysis integrated findings from 20 reviews and systematic analyses, with 379 cases reported since 2018. Hyaluronic acid (HA) was the most commonly used filler, particularly in nasal region injections. The average age of patients was 38, with a notable increase in case reports in 2020. Initial presentation data revealed that 60.9% of patients experienced no light perception, while ptosis and ophthalmoplegia were present in 54.3 and 42.7% of cases, respectively. The statistical and machine learning analyses did not establish a significant linkage between the HYAL dosage and patient recovery; however, the injection site emerged as a critical determinant.

conclusionThe study concludes that HYAL treatment, while vital for managing complications, varies in effectiveness based on the injection site and the timing of administration. The non-Newtonian characteristics of HA fillers may also affect the incidence of complications. The findings advocate for tailored treatment strategies incorporating individual patient variables, emphasizing prompt and precise intervention to mitigate the adverse effects of soft tissue fillers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Dermal FillersHyaluronoglucosaminidaseCosmetic TechniquesFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleStrokeSyndromeTreatment OutcomeDermal FillersHyaluronic AcidHyaluronoglucosaminidaseBlindnessCerebral infarctionHyaluronic acidHyaluronidaseSoft tissue fillers

Identifiers

PMID38971925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.