ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024
A pangenome analysis of ESKAPE bacteriophages: the underrepresentation may impact machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational insights into the natural phage endolysin linker landscape.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Isolation, characterization, and therapeutic assessment of novel phage vB_LSKP32 targeting KL64-type carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of microbiome communities within urban compost piles undergoing the heat process.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Engineering bacteriophages for gut health: precision antimicrobials and beyond.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Taming Superbugs: Current Progress and Challenges in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Targeting multidrug-resistant bacteria with genetic-information-free protein-only phages.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- SPAED: harnessing AlphaFold output for accurate segmentation of phage endolysin domains.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Fine-tuning protein language models unlocks the potential of underrepresented viral proteomes.PeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteriophages are the most prevalent biological entities in the biosphere. However, limitations in both medical relevance and sequencing technologies have led to a systematic underestimation of the genetic diversity within phages. This underrepresentation not only creates a significant gap in our understanding of phage roles across diverse biosystems but also introduces biases in computational models reliant on these data for training and testing. In this study, we focused on publicly available genomes of bacteriophages infecting high-priority ESKAPE pathogens to show the extent and impact of this underrepresentation. First, we demonstrate a stark underrepresentation of ESKAPE phage genomes within the public genome and protein databases. Next, a pangenome analysis of these ESKAPE phages reveals extensive sharing of core genes among phages infecting the same host. Furthermore, genome analyses and clustering highlight close nucleotide-level relationships among the ESKAPE phages, raising concerns about the limited diversity within current public databases. Lastly, we uncover a scarcity of unique lytic phages and phage proteins with antimicrobial activities against ESKAPE pathogens. This comprehensive analysis of the ESKAPE phages underscores the severity of underrepresentation and its potential implications. This lack of diversity in phage genomes may restrict the resurgence of phage therapy and cause biased outcomes in data-driven computational models due to incomplete and unbalanced biological datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.