ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2024
The Role of Pharmacogenomics Studies for Precision Medicine Among Ethiopian Patients and Their Clinical Implications: A Scoping Review.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking Ethiopia's genomic landscape and its global significance: a call for inclusive genomics research.Human genomics · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Repurposed Antiretrovirals in Hepatitis B Virus Treatment: A Narrative Review of the Pros and Cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pharmacogenomics research is currently revolutionizing treatment optimization by discovering molecular markers. Medicines are the cornerstone of treatment for both acute and chronic diseases. Pharmacogenomics associated treatment response varies from 20% to 95%, resulting in from lack of efficacy to serious toxicity. Pharmacogenomics has emerged as a useful tool for therapy optimization and plays a bigger role in clinical care going forward. However, in Africa, in particular in Ethiopia, such studies are scanty and not generalizing. Therefore, the objective of this review was to outline such studies, generating comprehensive evidence and identify studied variants' association with treatment responses in Ethiopian patients. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute's updated 2020 methodological guidelines for conducting and guidance for scoping reviews were used. We meticulously adhered to the systemic review reporting items checklist and scoping review meta-analyses extension. Results: Two hundred twenty-nine possibly relevant studies were searched. These include: 64, 54, 21, 48 and 42 from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and manual search, respectively. Seventy-seven duplicate studies were removed. Thirty-nine papers were rejected with justification, whereas 58 studies were qualified for full-text screening. Finally 19 studies were examined. The primary pharmacogene that was found to have a significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz was CYP2B6. Drug-induced liver injury has frequently identified toxicity among studied medications. Conclusion and Future Perspectives: Pharmacogenomics studies in Ethiopian populations are less abundant. The studies conducted focused on infectious diseases, specifically on HAART commonly efavirenz and backbone first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. There is a high need for further pharmacogenomics research to verify the discrepancies among the studies and for guiding precision medicine. Systematic review and meta-analysis are also recommended for pooled effects of different parameters in pharmacogenomics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.