ReviewaBIOTECH2024
Regulation of gene-edited plants in Europe: from the valley of tears into the shining sun?
Review in aBIOTECH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Nitrogen Fixation: Multifunctional Roles of Common Bean in Organic Agroecosystems and Ecosystem-Oriented Breeding Strategies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evolution and implementation of EU regulation on new genomic techniques.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Feeding the Future: Next-Generation Nutritional Frontiers-Innovations, Technologies, and Transformative Pathways for Sustainable Global Food Systems.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Mechanistic insights and breeding prospects of secondary metabolites in wheat salt stress tolerance.Planta · 2026Review
- The evolving landscape of precise DNA insertion in plants.Nature communications · 2025Review
- The Enhancement of Fungal Disease Resistance in Major Staple Crops Using CRISPR-Cas Technology.Genes · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
- The future of genome editing in plants.Nature plants · 2025Review
- Multi-Omic Advances in Olive Tree (Biology · 2025Review
- Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some 20 years ago, the EU introduced complex regulatory rules for the growth of transgenic crops, which resulted in a de facto ban to grow these plants in fields within most European countries. With the rise of novel genome editing technologies, it has become possible to improve crops genetically in a directed way without the need for incorporation of foreign genes. Unfortunately, in 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled that such gene-edited plants are to be regulated like transgenic plants. Since then, European scientists and breeders have challenged this decision and requested a revision of this outdated law. Finally, after 5 years, the European Commission has now published a proposal on how, in the future, to regulate crops produced by new breeding technologies. The proposal tries to find a balance between the different interest groups in Europe. On one side, genetically modified plants, which cannot be discerned from their natural counterparts, will exclusively be used for food and feed and are-besides a registration step-not to be regulated at all. On the other side, plants expressing herbicide resistance are to be excluded from this regulation, a concession to the strong environmental associations and NGOs in Europe. Moreover, edited crops are to be excluded from organic farming to protect the business interests of the strong organic sector in Europe. Nevertheless, if this law passes European parliament and council, unchanged, it will present a big step forward toward establishing a more sustainable European agricultural system. Thus, it might soon be possible to develop and grow crops that are more adapted to global warming and whose cultivation will require lower amounts of pesticides. However, there is still a long way to go until the law is passed. Too often, the storm of arguments raised by the opponents, based on irrational fears of mutations and a naive understanding of nature, has fallen on fruitful ground in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.