ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024
Impact of white matter hyperintensity volumes estimated by automated methods using deep learning on stroke outcomes in small vessel occlusion stroke.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying White Matter Hyperintensities: Automated Volumetry Compared with Visual Grading Scales.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Association between periventricular hyperintensity or deep white matter hyperintensity and outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although white matter hyperintensity (WMH) shares similar vascular risk and pathology with small vessel occlusion (SVO) stroke, there were few studies to evaluate the impact of the burden of WMH volume on early and delayed stroke outcomes in SVO stroke. Materials and methods: Using a multicenter registry database, we enrolled SVO stroke patients between August 2013 and November 2022. The WMH volume was estimated by automated methods using deep learning (VUNO Med-DeepBrain, Seoul, South Korea), which was a commercially available segmentation model. After propensity score matching (PSM), we evaluated the impact of WMH volume on early neurological deterioration (END) and poor functional outcomes at 3-month modified Ranking Scale (mRS), defined as mRS score >2 at 3 months, after an SVO stroke. Results: Among 1,718 SVO stroke cases, the prevalence of subjects with severe WMH (Fazekas score ≥ 3) was 68.9%. After PSM, END and poor functional outcomes at 3-month mRS (mRS > 2) were higher in the severe WMH group (END: 6.9 vs. 13.5%, Conclusion: This study used automated methods using a deep learning segmentation model to assess the impact of WMH burden on outcomes in SVO stroke. Our findings emphasize the significance of WMH burden in SVO stroke prognosis, encouraging tailored interventions for better patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.