Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975458›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: Prevalence, Predictors, and Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.

Sheethal G Oommen, Ruzhual K Man, Keerthi Talluri, Maryam Nizam, Tejashwini Kohir, Martin A Aviles, Mariana Nino, Lakshmi Gokulnath Jaisankar, Jashan Jaura, Randev A Wannakuwatte and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sheethal G OommenPsychiatry, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, ROU.
Ruzhual K ManResearch, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Mumbai, IND.
Keerthi TalluriDepartment of Medicine, Ganni Subba Lakshmi Medical College, Rajahmundry, IND.
Maryam NizamEmergency Department, Valaichennai Base Hospital, Valaichennai, LKA.
Tejashwini KohirDepartment of Medicine, Ganni Subba Lakshmi Medical College, Rajahmundry, IND.
Martin A AvilesCardiology, Amigos del Corazón, Quito, ECU.
Mariana NinoMedicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, COL.
Lakshmi Gokulnath JaisankarGeneral Medicine, Fathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Kadapa, IND.
Jashan JauraGeneral Practice, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Randev A WannakuwatteSurgery, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno, BLR.
Leo TomInternal Medicine, Kowdoor Sadananda Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, IND.
Jeby AbrahamGeneral Medicine, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, IND.
Humza F SiddiquiInternal Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a new category of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has emerged in the classification system. This is defined as the subgroup of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) whose left ventricular ejection fraction has recovered partially or completely, with no specific cut-off values established yet in the guidelines. In our review, we aim to provide an overview of prevalence, predictors, mechanism of remodeling, and management strategies regarding HFimpEF. These patients constitute a sizeable cohort among patients with reduced ejection fraction. Certain patient characteristics including younger age and female gender, absence of comorbid conditions, low levels of biomarkers, and non-ischemic etiology were identified as positive predictors. The heart undergoes significant maladaptive changes post failure leading to adverse remodeling influenced etiology and duration. Goal-directed medical therapy including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have notably improved cardiac function by inducing reverse remodeling. Despite a more favorable prognosis compared to HFrEF, patients with improved ejection fraction (EF) still face clinical events and reduced quality of life, and remain at risk of adverse outcomes. Although the evidence is scarce, it is advisable to continue treatment modalities despite improvement in EF, including device therapies, to prevent relapse and clinical deterioration. It is imperative to conduct further research to understand the mechanism leading to EF amelioration and establish guidelines to identify and direct management strategies.

Indexed as

b-type natriuretic peptide (bnp)guideline-directed medical therapy (gdmt)heart failure with improved ejection fraction (hfimpef)heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (hfref)left ventricular ejection fraction (lvef)outcomesremodeling

Identifiers

PMID38975458
PMCPMC11227107

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.