Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976371›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2024

Artificial intelligence-enhanced patient evaluation: bridging art and science.

Evangelos K Oikonomou, Rohan Khera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Electrocardiography.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evangelos K OikonomouSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208017, New Haven, 06520-8017 CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-0720
Rohan KheraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208017, New Haven, 06520-8017 CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-6199

Funding

Translating Personalized Inference from Randomized Clinical Trials to Real-World Cardiovascular CareR01HL167858 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Rohan Khera · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
Evaluating and Improving Utilization of Evidence-Based Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure using Automated Tools in the Electronic Health RecordK23HL153775 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHERA, ROHAN · 2021 to 2025
$918k
A multi-modal approach for efficient, point-of-care screening of hypertrophic cardiomyopathyF32HL170592 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OIKONOMOU, EVANGELOS · 2023 to 2024
$166k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2022060NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL170592NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153775NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167858NIH HHS 1F32HL170592-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of digital health and artificial intelligence (AI) has promised to revolutionize clinical care, but real-world patient evaluation has yet to witness transformative changes. As history taking and physical examination continue to rely on long-established practices, a growing pipeline of AI-enhanced digital tools may soon augment the traditional clinical encounter into a data-driven process. This article presents an evidence-backed vision of how promising AI applications may enhance traditional practices, streamlining tedious tasks while elevating diverse data sources, including AI-enabled stethoscopes, cameras, and wearable sensors, to platforms for personalized medicine and efficient care delivery. Through the lens of traditional patient evaluation, we illustrate how digital technologies may soon be interwoven into routine clinical workflows, introducing a novel paradigm of longitudinal monitoring. Finally, we provide a skeptic's view on the practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges that limit the uptake of such technologies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDigital HealthHumansPhysical ExaminationPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportDigital healthHealth technologyRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38976371
PMCPMC11400875

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.