Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38976372›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2024

Sex differences in treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a meta-analysis.

Iulia Iatan, Leo E Akioyamen, Isabelle Ruel, Amanda Guerin, Lindsay Hales, Thais Coutinho, Liam R Brunham, Jacques Genest

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iulia IatanDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Leo E AkioyamenDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isabelle RuelDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001, Decarie blvd. Office EM1.2212, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-8028
Amanda GuerinDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001, Decarie blvd. Office EM1.2212, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
Lindsay HalesMcGill University Health Center Libraries, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Thais CoutinhoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-5315
Liam R BrunhamDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jacques GenestDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001, Decarie blvd. Office EM1.2212, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-9663

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFamilial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly prevalent monogenic disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sex disparities in diagnosis, lipid-lowering therapy, and achieved lipid levels have emerged worldwide, resulting in barriers to care in FH. A systematic review was performed to investigate sex-related disparities in treatment, response, and lipid target achievement in FH (PROSPERO, CRD42022353297).

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and grey literature databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2023. Records were eligible if they described sex differences in the treatment of adults with FH.

resultsOf 4432 publications reviewed, 133 met our eligibility criteria. In 16 interventional clinical trials (eight randomized and eight non-randomized; 1840 participants, 49.4% females), there were no differences between males and females in response to fixed doses of lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting that sex was not a determinant of response. Meta-analysis of 25 real-world observational studies (129 441 participants, 53.4% females) found that females were less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy compared with males (odds ratio .74, 95% confidence interval .66-.85). Importantly, females were less likely to reach an LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L (odds ratio .85, 95% confidence interval .74-.97). Similarly, treated LDL-C levels were higher in females. Despite this, male sex was associated with a two-fold greater relative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular mortality.

conclusionsFemales with FH were less likely to be treated intensively and to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This sex bias represents a surmountable barrier to clinical care.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, LDLHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIAnticholesteremic AgentsFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleSex FactorsAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseFamilial hypercholesterolaemiaFemalesLipid-lowering treatmentSex differencesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38976372
PMCPMC11400737

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.